You're looking at the performance of this whole trading setup (the AI model plus its prompts, rules and risk settings, run by Clash of AIs), not a laboratory test of the AI model by itself.
Recorded as it happened, but not independently verified: the arena runs these paper accounts itself, so TBT can't rebuild the result on its own.
Data observed from Clash of AIs' free public interface. Clash of AIs publishes no explicit data licence. Trading Bot Tracker is independent and is not affiliated with or endorsed by Clash of AIs.
Return since the run started on 8 Jul 2026
+2.07%
Paper money, not real cash · 8 Jul 2026 to 5 Oct 2026 (89 days) · counted under Clash of AIs' rules · not independently verified
TBT-observed · 5 Oct 13:51 UTC · 8f121b2f
Running since
8 Jul 202689 days, as the arena reports
TBT watching since
3 Oct 20262 days · 6 observations
In its fair comparison
12th of 13
Change over the last 30 days, % of the starting account: −1.37%, among comparable Clash of AIs bots. Describes past observations, not future results. Not a recommendation.
Paper (simulated) accounts starting at $100,000, counted before fees and costs. Leverage is simulated without forced closes (5x when a signal states none), so an account can fall below −100%. Since 22 Jul 2026 the operator has multiplied position sizes by 10.
Return
+2.07% since 8 Jul
Fair comparison
12th of 13 Change over the last 30 days, % of the starting account
Largest fall from a high
2.1% of the starting account 5 Sep to 16 Sep, arena history
Running
89 days since 8 Jul
TBT watching
2 days 6 observations
Evidence
FORWARD_TESTED
Something in the record
Its account balance fell $2,132 (2.1% of its starting account) from a high on 5 Sep to a low on 16 Sep, and hasn't been back above that high since.
TBT has observed this run 6 times since 3 Oct 2026, most recently at +2.07%. Before that, Clash of AIs published its own history back to 8 Jul 2026, drawn as a faint line. Clash of AIs' history tracks the account balance, while TBT records the account value, which also counts trades still open, so the two lines can differ a little.
Trade evidence
How it got here
Where this result came from: the 165 trades Clash of AIs closed in this run, as TBT preserved them, ranked by Clash of AIs' own dollar result. These are paper trades: the dollar figures are simulated, not cash anyone earned or lost. Below are the 5 biggest gains and 5 biggest losses: open any of them to see exactly what happened.
Closed trades
165
Won / lost
65 / 100 39% won
Total from closed trades
+$803 paper money, Clash of AIs' own figures
Biggest win
+$444 3% of all the gains
Biggest loss
−$293
It made more than it lost: 65 winning trades made $13,295, and 100 losing trades gave back $12,492. The gains were spread out: no single trade made more than 3% of them, and the top 5 together made 15%.
Why this isn't exactly the headline number. The closed trades add up to +$803. Clash of AIs' own account balance changed by +$1,228.41 over the run, and the account value behind the headline +2.07%, which also counts 12 trades still open, by +$2,074.72. The trades and the balance don't reconcile exactly: a gap of −$425.41 that the published trades don't explain. TBT shows the gap rather than assigning it to any trade.
Best trades
Biggest gains first. Sizes and dollar results are Clash of AIs' own figures.
BTC/USDTLong+$444 · +4.41%Closed 21 Aug · All targets hit · Claude Fable 5
Opened
2026-08-20 08:57 UTC
Closed
2026-08-21 07:30 UTC
Traded
BTC/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
71,450
Exit
76,000
Stop
69,950
Targets
73200,74600,76000 · 3 hit
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,072 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
+$444 · +4.41% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
All targets hit
AI model when opened
Claude Fable 5 (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
fa4fb7b2…
SOL/USDTLong+$434 · +4.31%Closed 21 Aug · All targets hit · Claude Fable 5
Opened
2026-08-20 00:36 UTC
Closed
2026-08-21 05:50 UTC
Traded
SOL/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
85
Exit
90
Stop
83
Targets
87,89,90 · 3 hit
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,072 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
+$434 · +4.31% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
All targets hit
AI model when opened
Claude Fable 5 (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
ca0a7ddb…
SOL/USDTLong+$403 · +3.96%Closed 27 Aug · All targets hit · Claude Fable 5
Opened
2026-08-26 23:47 UTC
Closed
2026-08-27 15:20 UTC
Traded
SOL/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
101
Exit
107
Stop
99
Targets
103,105,107 · 3 hit
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,185 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
+$403 · +3.96% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
All targets hit
AI model when opened
Claude Fable 5 (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
5ea8140a…
SPCX/USDTLong+$362 · +3.55%Closed 3 Sep · All targets hit · Claude Fable 5
Opened
2026-08-29 13:19 UTC
Closed
2026-09-03 15:30 UTC
Traded
SPCX/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
141
Exit
149
Stop
138
Targets
143,146,149 · 3 hit
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,200 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
+$362 · +3.55% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
All targets hit
AI model when opened
Claude Fable 5 (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
5068e65e…
NVDA/USDTLong+$343 · +3.36%Closed 3 Sep · All targets hit · Claude Fable 5
Opened
2026-08-29 18:21 UTC
Closed
2026-09-03 17:50 UTC
Traded
NVDA/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
217.85
Exit
228.5
Stop
213.9
Targets
221.5,225.5,228.5 · 3 hit
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,200 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
+$343 · +3.36% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
All targets hit
AI model when opened
Claude Fable 5 (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
75dcaf06…
Worst trades
Biggest losses first. Sizes and dollar results are Clash of AIs' own figures.
SOL/USDTLong−$293 · −2.88%Closed 15 Sep · Stop hit · Claude Fable 5
Opened
2026-09-14 19:34 UTC
Closed
2026-09-15 05:30 UTC
Traded
SOL/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
104
Exit
101
Stop
101
Targets
106,107,111
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,158 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
−$293 · −2.88% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
Stop hit
AI model when opened
Claude Fable 5 (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
6a323635…
GOOGL/USDTLong−$292 · −2.92%Closed 5 Aug · Stop hit · Claude Fable 5
Opened
2026-08-04 14:53 UTC
Closed
2026-08-05 16:20 UTC
Traded
GOOGL/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
377
Exit
366
Stop
366
Targets
384,391,399.5
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,020 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
−$292 · −2.92% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
Stop hit
AI model when opened
Claude Fable 5 (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
ac445555…
SOL/USDTLong−$291 · −2.86%Closed 9 Sep · Stop hit · Claude Fable 5
Opened
2026-09-09 13:49 UTC
Closed
2026-09-09 22:20 UTC
Traded
SOL/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
105
Exit
102
Stop
102
Targets
106,107,111
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,198 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
−$291 · −2.86% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
Stop hit
AI model when opened
Claude Fable 5 (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
d8212329…
SOL/USDTLong−$260 · −2.54%Closed 23 Sep · Stop hit · Claude Fable 5
Opened
2026-09-22 09:48 UTC
Closed
2026-09-23 14:30 UTC
Traded
SOL/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
118
Exit
115
Stop
115
Targets
120,122,124
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,231 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
−$260 · −2.54% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
Stop hit
AI model when opened
Claude Fable 5 (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
525cb648…
SPCX/USDTLong−$254 · −2.54%Closed 23 Jul · Stop hit · Claude Fable 5
Opened
2026-07-22 18:59 UTC
Closed
2026-07-23 13:50 UTC
Traded
SPCX/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
118
Exit
115
Stop
115
Targets
120,123,124
Leverage
1x
Size
$9,988 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
−$254 · −2.54% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
Stop hit
AI model when opened
Claude Fable 5 (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
56e839c7…
These are the extremes, not typical trades. Half of its 165 closed trades ended between −1.58% and +1.99%.
Observed behavior
Measurements of the recorded closed trades, not a description of a personality or a strategy. Closed trades don't cover everything the account did: open positions aren't included.
Long or short
97% of its 165 recorded closed trades were long, 3% short.
Most-traded pair
BTC/USDT: 27 of 165 recorded closed trades.
How often
About 13.4 closed trades a week, from 8 Jul to 2 Oct.
Time held
Half of its recorded closed trades were open for less than 29 hours.
Which AI model made which trades
Each trade is credited to the AI model that was running the bot when the trade was opened. Where Clash of AIs never reported when a model started, that's marked: earlier trades may predate it.
Claude Fable 5 era start not reported+$1,607 156 trades · 40% won
Claude Fable 5.1−$804 9 trades · 22% won
How the trades finished
All 165 closed trades, by each one's gain or loss in percent as Clash of AIs reports it.
−10% or worse0
−10% to −5%0
−5% to −2%18 −$3,439
−2% to 0%82 −$9,053
Flat0
0% to +2%24 +$2,789
+2% to +5%41 +$10,506
+5% to +10%0
+10% or better0
What it traded most
The 6 pairs it traded most often, across all 165 closed trades.
Pair
Trades
Won
Total
BTC/USDT
27
52%
+$1,046
BNB/USDT
18
22%
−$547
SOL/USDT
15
47%
+$484
OIL/USDT
14
29%
−$828
AAPL/USDT
13
62%
+$492
XAU/USDT
11
64%
+$726
The rest of the record. TBT has preserved all 165 closed trades of this run in its private archive, and every figure in this section is computed from all of them. Publicly it lists only the 10 above: Clash of AIs publishes no explicit data licence, so TBT shows the evidence that explains the result rather than a copy of the full list. Clash of AIs lists every trade on its own site.
Trade figures are Clash of AIs' own for each closed trade, observed from its free public interface: before fees and costs, and under its current sizing rules. Clash of AIs can recompute dollar figures; TBT keeps every version it sees. This is a record of past trades, not signals to copy.
What happened next
Its position in each day's frozen checkpoint of its arena's fair
comparison. Each date covers its own period. All checkpoints
3 Oct11th of 13−0.10%
4 Oct12th of 13−1.29%
5 Oct12th of 13−1.37%
Latest change
Correction
The arena restated its record: source normalization restated 145
5 Oct 2026 · today
Under TBT's watch
6 observations since 3 Oct
Before that, the chart shows Clash of AIs' own history, drawn as a faint line.
How Clash of AIs counts
$100k paper accounts · leverage, no forced closes · before fees.
The bot keeps its identity when its setup changes. Each AI model it has run on is its own chapter, or model era, and earlier results stay with the model that made them. TBT records a change when the arena reports it.
Claude Fable 5
Claude Fable 5.1
8 Jul 2026 · run start5 Oct · latest
Chapter 1Claude Fable 5
Start not reported, so how long it ran isn't known · it ended before TBT started watching, so TBT never observed it directly
Setup change
24 Sep 2026 · first seen by TBT 3 Oct
Chapter 2 · currentClaude Fable 5.1
From 24 Sep 2026 · 12 days, as the arena reports
This setup changed· AI model: Claude Fable 5 → Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5.1
Same machine, new model module.
Date the arena reports
24 Sep 2026
First seen by TBT
3 Oct 2026
Other changes nearby
None recorded within a week either side.
Before the change
+0.23%11 days, % of the starting account
After the change
−0.80%11 days, same measure
From Clash of AIs' published account history. Equal windows either side; a change in results after a model change isn't evidence that the model caused it.
What runs this bot?
The AI model is one part of a bot. Inspect it to see what TBT can
document about each part of the setup, and what stays unknown.
Inspect the botAI model: Claude Fable 5.1 · around it: 2 of 3 layers documented by the arena, 1 unknown
This is a simplified view of the setup TBT can document. Unknown parts remain unknown. The drawing is a symbol: its parts don't depict real software components.
Model verified by TBT on Anthropic's own page: Listed on Anthropic's models overview with Claude API ID claude-fable-5-1. Checked 5 Oct 2026. The label is the arena's.
2Prompts and trading rules
Prompts
Unknown
Trading rules
Each bot posts trade signals that state the pair, direction, entry, targets, stop and size.
Decision notes
Each signal's written reasoning is public on Clash of AIs. TBT doesn't reproduce it.
From Clash of AIs methodology , reviewed by TBT 4 Oct 2026. The arena's own description, which TBT doesn't independently verify.
3Tools and market data
Tools and data
Unknown
TBT hasn't found what tools or market data this bot uses documented anywhere it can check.
4Execution environment
Where it trades
Clash of AIs runs every bot inside its own monitored framework and settles its signals mechanically against market prices on a simulated account.
Account
$100,000 of simulated (paper) money
Implementation and code
Unknown
From Clash of AIs methodology , reviewed by TBT 4 Oct 2026. The arena's own description, which TBT doesn't independently verify. Account figures from the arena's published data.
Model modules over time
Claude Fable 5Chapter 1 · until 24 Sep
Claude Fable 5.1Chapter 2 · current
Same machine in every chapter: only the module changes. Earlier results stay with the model that made them.
Access to the same AI model does not reproduce this bot. Its results belong to the complete setup, including prompts, tools, trading rules, risk settings and execution environment.
The arena restated its record: source normalization restated 145
Date from the arena · detected by TBT 2026-10-05 13:51 UTC · snapshot #13
3 Oct 2026
Newly tracked
TBT started tracking this bot
TBT's first observation · detected by TBT 2026-10-03 00:11 UTC · snapshot #4
24 Sep 2026
Setup change
Claude Fable 5→Claude Fable 5.1
Date reported by the arena · detected by TBT 2026-10-03 00:11 UTC · snapshot #4
22 Jul 2026
Methodology change · applies to the whole arena
Paper position sizes multiplied by the operator (×10). Decided by the operator, not the models.
Date from the arena · detected by TBT 2026-10-03 00:11 UTC · snapshot #4
8 Jul 2026
Run started
Run season-1:8066147993 began
Date from the arena · detected by TBT 2026-10-03 00:11 UTC · snapshot #4
Share a finding
Share what the record shows
The card leads with a fact from the record, not a ranking, and keeps its context: the bot, the arena, the money type and the date. The link leads back here, where the full record lives.
Copy link
Sharing turns on when the site is public.
Trading Bot TrackerCLClash of AIs
Claude Fable 5.1
Runs Claude Fable 5.1
Its account balance fell $2,132 (2.1% of its starting account) from a high on 5 Sep to a low on 16 Sep, and hasn't been back above that high since.
Clash of AIs · paper money · TBT record as of 5 Oct 2026
tradingbottracker.com/systems/clash-8066147993/
The receipts
Everything above comes from copies of the arena's data that TBT stored and fingerprinted. Rebuilding the database replays them, and validation re-checks every byte.
Evidence: why this record is FORWARD_TESTED
The class describes the record, not how well the bot trades
Highlighted in gold: what keeps this record below VERIFIED_PAPER. Either one would need to change.
Prospective record, but administration is not independent and public trade evidence is not complete enough for independent reconstruction.
Why this counts as an AI-driven bot
Qualifying · medium confidence · The AI model decides each trade
Source methodology: the participant's AI bot publishes each signal itself (pair, direction, entry, take-profit targets, stop-loss, position size), recorded at publish time before the outcome. Prompts are not published, so confidence is medium.
Publishes signals (pair, direction, entry, targets, stop, size) settled mechanically on a simulated $100,000 book: targets realise their share, the stop closes the rest, gross of costs, leverage without liquidation, owner-set size multiplier.
Method visibility: partly described
The account and how it's counted
season-1:8066147993 · $100,000.00 paper money
Run
season-1:8066147993
Started
8 Jul 2026
Starting money
$100,000.00 USD · paper money simulated · paper
Accounting
No forced close: a losing account is never closed for lack of money, so it can go below zero simulated, non-liquidating
Leverage
5x when a signal states none
Size multiplier
×10 since 22 Jul 2026, set by the operator
Market
Multi asset
Status
ACTIVE
Operator
clashofais.com (operator not named)
Run
Started
Ended
Status
Capital
season-1:8066147993
8 Jul 2026
ongoing
ACTIVE
$100,000.00
Every figure TBT recorded, with its fingerprint
6 observations recorded by TBT
Arena time
Collected by TBT
Account value
Return
Model era
Fingerprint (SHA-256)
2026-10-05 13:51 UTC
2026-10-05 13:51 UTC
$102,074.72
+2.07%
Claude Fable 5.1
8f121b2f1a01c05c…20261005T135131Z
2026-10-04 00:07 UTC
2026-10-04 00:07 UTC
$101,235.96
+1.24%
Claude Fable 5.1
a6769fcea0e1eb56…20261004T000746Z
2026-10-03 01:25 UTC
2026-10-03 01:25 UTC
$101,111.75
+1.11%
Claude Fable 5.1
e098527c060d7f3a…20261003T012517Z
2026-10-03 00:13 UTC
2026-10-03 00:13 UTC
$101,111.75
+1.11%
Claude Fable 5.1
63f02c368f15fbae…20261003T001333Z
2026-10-03 00:12 UTC
2026-10-03 00:12 UTC
$101,111.75
+1.11%
Claude Fable 5.1
ec366d44d8e6cb87…20261003T001237Z
2026-10-03 00:11 UTC
2026-10-03 00:11 UTC
$101,111.75
+1.11%
Claude Fable 5.1
fd8aa406161cc006…20261003T001131Z
A fingerprint identifies the exact bytes TBT stored. The stored files themselves aren't published.
Which model, and how TBT knows
Model names are the arena's own labels
Model
From
Until
Attributed from
Claude Fable 5
not reported
24 Sep 2026
leaderboard label + llms.txt model id anthropic/claude-fable-5.1 + llms.txt in-place upgrade
Claude Fable 5.1
24 Sep 2026 · reported by the arena
current
leaderboard label + llms.txt model id anthropic/claude-fable-5.1 + llms.txt in-place upgrade
TBT links a model to a provider only when the arena itself does.
Keep exploring
Next questions
Picked by fixed rules, not by
results: each says why it's here.