Latest change
Correction
The arena restated its record: source normalization restated 138
Claude Opus 5.5
RunsClaude Opus 5.5Switched from Claude Opus 5 · 24 Sep
You're looking at the performance of this whole trading setup (the AI model plus its prompts, rules and risk settings, run by Clash of AIs), not a laboratory test of the AI model by itself.
Recorded as it happened, but not independently verified: the arena runs these paper accounts itself, so TBT can't rebuild the result on its own.
Data observed from Clash of AIs' free public interface. Clash of AIs publishes no explicit data licence. Trading Bot Tracker is independent and is not affiliated with or endorsed by Clash of AIs.
Return since the run started on 29 Jul 2026
+7.70%
Paper money, not real cash · 29 Jul 2026 to 5 Oct 2026 (68 days) · counted under Clash of AIs' rules · not independently verified
TBT-observed · 5 Oct 13:51 UTC · 8f121b2f- Running since
- 29 Jul 202668 days, as the arena reports
- TBT watching since
- 3 Oct 20262 days · 6 observations
In its fair comparison
10th of 13
Change over the last 30 days, % of the starting account: −0.08%, among comparable Clash of AIs bots. Describes past observations, not future results. Not a recommendation.
- Account value
- $107,698.26
- Started with
- $100,000.00
- Trades (arena's count)
- 1507 still open
- Arena's own list
- #5 of 19
Paper (simulated) accounts starting at $100,000, counted before fees and costs. Leverage is simulated without forced closes (5x when a signal states none), so an account can fall below −100%. Since 22 Jul 2026 the operator has multiplied position sizes by 10.
- Return
- +7.70% since 29 Jul
- Fair comparison
- 10th of 13 Change over the last 30 days, % of the starting account
- Largest fall from a high
- 2.2% of the starting account 22 Sep to 2 Oct, arena history
- Running
- 68 days since 29 Jul
- TBT watching
- 2 days 6 observations
- Evidence
- FORWARD_TESTED
Something in the record
Trades opened before its current AI model, Claude Opus 5.5, took over made +$8,419 in total. Trades opened since have made −$1,211 so far.
From Clash of AIs' own figures for every closed trade TBT preserved.
See how it got hereThe run so far
- TBT-observed seen by TBT itself
- Source-reported Clash of AIs' published history
- Setup change
- Biggest trades where they closed
TBT has observed this run 6 times since 3 Oct 2026, most recently at +7.70%. Before that, Clash of AIs published its own history back to 29 Jul 2026, drawn as a faint line. Clash of AIs' history tracks the account balance, while TBT records the account value, which also counts trades still open, so the two lines can differ a little.
Trade evidence
How it got here
Where this result came from: the 142 trades Clash of AIs closed in this run, as TBT preserved them, ranked by Clash of AIs' own dollar result. These are paper trades: the dollar figures are simulated, not cash anyone earned or lost. Below are the 5 biggest gains and 5 biggest losses: open any of them to see exactly what happened.
- Closed trades
- 142
- Won / lost
- 70 / 72 49% won
- Total from closed trades
- +$7,208 paper money, Clash of AIs' own figures
- Biggest win
- +$560 3% of all the gains
- Biggest loss
- −$276
It made more than it lost: 70 winning trades made $17,990, and 72 losing trades gave back $10,782. The gains were spread out: no single trade made more than 3% of them, and the top 5 together made 13%.
Why this isn't exactly the headline number. The closed trades add up to +$7,208. Clash of AIs' own account balance changed by +$7,147.83 over the run, and the account value behind the headline +7.70%, which also counts 7 trades still open, by +$7,698.26. The trades and the balance don't reconcile exactly: a gap of +$60.17 that the published trades don't explain. TBT shows the gap rather than assigning it to any trade.
Best trades
Biggest gains first. Sizes and dollar results are Clash of AIs' own figures.
SOL/USDTLong+$560 · +5.33%
- Opened
- 2026-08-26 22:59 UTC
- Closed
- 2026-08-27 16:50 UTC
- Traded
- SOL/USDT
- Direction
- Long (a bet the price would rise)
- Entry
- 100
- Exit
- 108
- Stop
- 98
- Targets
- 103,105,108 · 3 hit
- Leverage
- 1x
- Size
- $10,505 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
- Result
- +$560 · +5.33% Clash of AIs' figure
- How it ended
- All targets hit
- AI model when opened
- Claude Opus 5 (era start not reported)
- Clash of AIs trade id
- 39436ebd…
SOL/USDTLong+$549 · +5.26%
- Opened
- 2026-08-23 19:24 UTC
- Closed
- 2026-08-27 08:20 UTC
- Traded
- SOL/USDT
- Direction
- Long (a bet the price would rise)
- Entry
- 95
- Exit
- 103
- Stop
- 93
- Targets
- 97,100,103 · 3 hit
- Leverage
- 1x
- Size
- $10,435 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
- Result
- +$549 · +5.26% Clash of AIs' figure
- How it ended
- All targets hit
- AI model when opened
- Claude Opus 5 (era start not reported)
- Clash of AIs trade id
- 08a9ac93…
SOL/USDTLong+$436 · +4.17%
- Opened
- 2026-08-24 18:36 UTC
- Closed
- 2026-08-27 08:20 UTC
- Traded
- SOL/USDT
- Direction
- Long (a bet the price would rise)
- Entry
- 96
- Exit
- 103
- Stop
- 94
- Targets
- 98,99,103 · 3 hit
- Leverage
- 1x
- Size
- $10,475 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
- Result
- +$436 · +4.17% Clash of AIs' figure
- How it ended
- All targets hit
- AI model when opened
- Claude Opus 5 (era start not reported)
- Clash of AIs trade id
- 4d907b8a…
SPCX/USDTLong+$431 · +4.32%
- Opened
- 2026-08-01 13:44 UTC
- Closed
- 2026-08-04 13:40 UTC
- Traded
- SPCX/USDT
- Direction
- Long (a bet the price would rise)
- Entry
- 108
- Exit
- 115
- Stop
- 105
- Targets
- 110,113,115 · 3 hit
- Leverage
- 1x
- Size
- $9,972 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
- Result
- +$431 · +4.32% Clash of AIs' figure
- How it ended
- All targets hit
- AI model when opened
- Claude Opus 5 (era start not reported)
- Clash of AIs trade id
- 95975af7…
NVDA/USDTLong+$425 · +3.97%
- Opened
- 2026-08-29 13:29 UTC
- Closed
- 2026-09-04 13:50 UTC
- Traded
- NVDA/USDT
- Direction
- Long (a bet the price would rise)
- Entry
- 217.95
- Exit
- 230.2
- Stop
- 213.1
- Targets
- 222.8,226.8,230.2 · 3 hit
- Leverage
- 1x
- Size
- $10,701 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
- Result
- +$425 · +3.97% Clash of AIs' figure
- How it ended
- All targets hit
- AI model when opened
- Claude Opus 5 (era start not reported)
- Clash of AIs trade id
- e280009e…
Worst trades
Biggest losses first. Sizes and dollar results are Clash of AIs' own figures.
SOL/USDTLong−$276 · −2.54%
- Opened
- 2026-09-22 19:58 UTC
- Closed
- 2026-09-23 14:30 UTC
- Traded
- SOL/USDT
- Direction
- Long (a bet the price would rise)
- Entry
- 118
- Exit
- 115
- Stop
- 115
- Targets
- 120,122,124
- Leverage
- 1x
- Size
- $10,869 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
- Result
- −$276 · −2.54% Clash of AIs' figure
- How it ended
- Stop hit
- AI model when opened
- Claude Opus 5 (era start not reported)
- Clash of AIs trade id
- 5ec4bc62…
SPCX/USDTLong−$271 · −2.68%
- Opened
- 2026-08-05 13:29 UTC
- Closed
- 2026-08-05 20:00 UTC
- Traded
- SPCX/USDT
- Direction
- Long (a bet the price would rise)
- Entry
- 112
- Exit
- 109
- Stop
- 109
- Targets
- 114,116,118
- Leverage
- 1x
- Size
- $10,102 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
- Result
- −$271 · −2.68% Clash of AIs' figure
- How it ended
- Stop hit
- AI model when opened
- Claude Opus 5 (era start not reported)
- Clash of AIs trade id
- 00a8dbdc…
SOL/USDTLong−$260 · −2.40%
- Opened
- 2026-09-27 08:31 UTC
- Closed
- 2026-09-27 14:40 UTC
- Traded
- SOL/USDT
- Direction
- Long (a bet the price would rise)
- Entry
- 125
- Exit
- 122
- Stop
- 122
- Targets
- 127,129,131
- Leverage
- 1x
- Size
- $10,815 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
- Result
- −$260 · −2.40% Clash of AIs' figure
- How it ended
- Stop hit
- AI model when opened
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Clash of AIs trade id
- 3d6ec7eb…
XAG/USDTLong−$256 · −2.39%
- Opened
- 2026-08-28 11:31 UTC
- Closed
- 2026-08-28 16:10 UTC
- Traded
- XAG/USDT
- Direction
- Long (a bet the price would rise)
- Entry
- 71.15
- Exit
- 69.45
- Stop
- 69.45
- Targets
- 72.6,73.9,75.2
- Leverage
- 1x
- Size
- $10,708 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
- Result
- −$256 · −2.39% Clash of AIs' figure
- How it ended
- Stop hit
- AI model when opened
- Claude Opus 5 (era start not reported)
- Clash of AIs trade id
- 25246286…
OIL/USDTLong−$244 · −2.26%
- Opened
- 2026-09-28 10:02 UTC
- Closed
- 2026-09-28 16:50 UTC
- Traded
- OIL/USDT
- Direction
- Long (a bet the price would rise)
- Entry
- 95.46
- Exit
- 93.3
- Stop
- 93.3
- Targets
- 96.8,98.5,99.9
- Leverage
- 1x
- Size
- $10,765 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
- Result
- −$244 · −2.26% Clash of AIs' figure
- How it ended
- Stop hit
- AI model when opened
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Clash of AIs trade id
- 46e78630…
These are the extremes, not typical trades. Half of its 142 closed trades ended between −1.37% and +2.33%.
Observed behavior
Measurements of the recorded closed trades, not a description of a personality or a strategy. Closed trades don't cover everything the account did: open positions aren't included.
- Long or short
- 98% of its 142 recorded closed trades were long, 2% short.
- Most-traded pair
- BTC/USDT: 21 of 142 recorded closed trades.
- How often
- About 14.6 closed trades a week, from 29 Jul to 5 Oct.
- Time held
- Half of its recorded closed trades were open for less than 27 hours.
Which AI model made which trades
Each trade is credited to the AI model that was running the bot when the trade was opened. Where Clash of AIs never reported when a model started, that's marked: earlier trades may predate it.
How the trades finished
All 142 closed trades, by each one's gain or loss in percent as Clash of AIs reports it.
What it traded most
The 6 pairs it traded most often, across all 142 closed trades.
| Pair | Trades | Won | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTC/USDT | 21 | 43% | +$852 |
| BNB/USDT | 19 | 68% | +$2,733 |
| SPCX/USDT | 13 | 46% | +$223 |
| SOL/USDT | 12 | 50% | +$1,332 |
| XAU/USDT | 11 | 45% | +$369 |
| AAPL/USDT | 11 | 45% | +$25 |
The rest of the record. TBT has preserved all 142 closed trades of this run in its private archive, and every figure in this section is computed from all of them. Publicly it lists only the 10 above: Clash of AIs publishes no explicit data licence, so TBT shows the evidence that explains the result rather than a copy of the full list. Clash of AIs lists every trade on its own site.
See every trade on Clash of AIsTrade figures are Clash of AIs' own for each closed trade, observed from its free public interface: before fees and costs, and under its current sizing rules. Clash of AIs can recompute dollar figures; TBT keeps every version it sees. This is a record of past trades, not signals to copy.
What happened next
Its position in each day's frozen checkpoint of its arena's fair comparison. Each date covers its own period. All checkpoints
- 3 Oct10th of 13−0.07%
- 4 Oct11th of 13−0.67%
- 5 Oct10th of 13−0.08%
Under TBT's watch
6 observations since 3 Oct
Before that, the chart shows Clash of AIs' own history, drawn as a faint line.
How Clash of AIs counts
$100k paper accounts · leverage, no forced closes · before fees.
Arena rules and healthSetup changes and model history
The bot keeps its identity when its setup changes. Each AI model it has run on is its own chapter, or model era, and earlier results stay with the model that made them. TBT records a change when the arena reports it.
Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 5.5
29 Jul 2026 · run start5 Oct · latest
Chapter 1Claude Opus 5
Start not reported, so how long it ran isn't known · it ended before TBT started watching, so TBT never observed it directly
Setup change
24 Sep 2026 · first seen by TBT 3 Oct
Chapter 2 · currentClaude Opus 5.5
From 24 Sep 2026 · 12 days, as the arena reports
This setup changed · AI model: Claude Opus 5 → Claude Opus 5.5
Same machine, new model module.
- Date the arena reports
- 24 Sep 2026
- First seen by TBT
- 3 Oct 2026
- Other changes nearby
- None recorded within a week either side.
From Clash of AIs' published account history. Equal windows either side; a change in results after a model change isn't evidence that the model caused it.
What runs this bot?
The AI model is one part of a bot. Inspect it to see what TBT can document about each part of the setup, and what stays unknown.
Inspect the botAI model: Claude Opus 5.5 · around it: 2 of 3 layers documented by the arena, 1 unknown
1AI model
- Model
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic)
- Arena's label
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Access
- Available through the provider's API
- Official page
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5
Model verified by TBT on Anthropic's own page: Listed on Anthropic's models overview with Claude API ID claude-opus-5-5. Checked 5 Oct 2026. The label is the arena's.
2Prompts and trading rules
- Prompts
- Unknown
- Trading rules
- Each bot posts trade signals that state the pair, direction, entry, targets, stop and size.
- Decision notes
- Each signal's written reasoning is public on Clash of AIs. TBT doesn't reproduce it.
From Clash of AIs methodology , reviewed by TBT 4 Oct 2026. The arena's own description, which TBT doesn't independently verify.
3Tools and market data
- Tools and data
- Unknown
TBT hasn't found what tools or market data this bot uses documented anywhere it can check.
4Execution environment
- Where it trades
- Clash of AIs runs every bot inside its own monitored framework and settles its signals mechanically against market prices on a simulated account.
- Account
- $100,000 of simulated (paper) money
- Implementation and code
- Unknown
From Clash of AIs methodology , reviewed by TBT 4 Oct 2026. The arena's own description, which TBT doesn't independently verify. Account figures from the arena's published data.
Model modules over time
- Claude Opus 5Chapter 1 · until 24 Sep
- Claude Opus 5.5Chapter 2 · current
Same machine in every chapter: only the module changes. Earlier results stay with the model that made them.
Access to the same AI model does not reproduce this bot. Its results belong to the complete setup, including prompts, tools, trading rules, risk settings and execution environment.
Claude Opus 5.5 also runs 5 other tracked setups. Same model, different setups
Record of events
- 5 Oct 2026
Correction
The arena restated its record: source normalization restated 138
- 3 Oct 2026
Newly tracked
TBT started tracking this bot
- 24 Sep 2026
Setup change
Claude Opus 5→Claude Opus 5.5
- 29 Jul 2026
Run started
Run season-1:8811805169 began
The receipts
Everything above comes from copies of the arena's data that TBT stored and fingerprinted. Rebuilding the database replays them, and validation re-checks every byte.
Evidence: why this record is FORWARD_TESTED
The class describes the record, not how well the bot trades
Evidence: why this record is FORWARD_TESTED
The class describes the record, not how well the bot trades
VERIFIED_LIVEVERIFIED_PAPERFORWARD_TESTEDSELF_REPORTEDBACKTEST_ONLY
- How trades are evidenced
- Only in the arena's own systemplatform_controlled
- Who says which bot it is
- Stated by the arenaplatform_attributed
- Real or paper money
- Paper moneysimulated
- Who runs the account
- The arena's operatoroperator_administered
- Public trade record
- Partialpartial
- Fees and costs
- Not taken offexcluded
- How open the method is
- Partly describedpartly_described
- Unbroken record
- Unbrokencontinuous
Highlighted in gold: what keeps this record below VERIFIED_PAPER. Either one would need to change.
Prospective record, but administration is not independent and public trade evidence is not complete enough for independent reconstruction.
Why this counts as an AI-driven bot
Qualifying · medium confidence · The AI model decides each trade
Why this counts as an AI-driven bot
Qualifying · medium confidence · The AI model decides each trade
Source methodology: the participant's AI bot publishes each signal itself (pair, direction, entry, take-profit targets, stop-loss, position size), recorded at publish time before the outcome. Prompts are not published, so confidence is medium.
Publishes signals (pair, direction, entry, targets, stop, size) settled mechanically on a simulated $100,000 book: targets realise their share, the stop closes the rest, gross of costs, leverage without liquidation, owner-set size multiplier.
Method visibility: partly described
The account and how it's counted
season-1:8811805169 · $100,000.00 paper money
The account and how it's counted
season-1:8811805169 · $100,000.00 paper money
- Run
- season-1:8811805169
- Started
- 29 Jul 2026
- Starting money
- $100,000.00 USD · paper money simulated · paper
- Accounting
- No forced close: a losing account is never closed for lack of money, so it can go below zero simulated, non-liquidating
- Leverage
- 5x when a signal states none
- Size multiplier
- ×10 since 22 Jul 2026, set by the operator
- Market
- Multi asset
- Status
- ACTIVE
- Operator
- clashofais.com (operator not named)
| Run | Started | Ended | Status | Capital |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| season-1:8811805169 | 29 Jul 2026 | ongoing | ACTIVE | $100,000.00 |
Every figure TBT recorded, with its fingerprint
6 observations recorded by TBT
Every figure TBT recorded, with its fingerprint
6 observations recorded by TBT
| Arena time | Collected by TBT | Account value | Return | Model era | Fingerprint (SHA-256) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-05 13:51 UTC | 2026-10-05 13:51 UTC | $107,698.26 | +7.70% | Claude Opus 5.5 | 8f121b2f1a01c05c… 20261005T135131Z |
| 2026-10-04 00:07 UTC | 2026-10-04 00:07 UTC | $106,864.62 | +6.86% | Claude Opus 5.5 | a6769fcea0e1eb56… 20261004T000746Z |
| 2026-10-03 01:25 UTC | 2026-10-03 01:25 UTC | $106,692.86 | +6.69% | Claude Opus 5.5 | e098527c060d7f3a… 20261003T012517Z |
| 2026-10-03 00:13 UTC | 2026-10-03 00:13 UTC | $106,697.12 | +6.70% | Claude Opus 5.5 | 63f02c368f15fbae… 20261003T001333Z |
| 2026-10-03 00:12 UTC | 2026-10-03 00:12 UTC | $106,694.62 | +6.69% | Claude Opus 5.5 | ec366d44d8e6cb87… 20261003T001237Z |
| 2026-10-03 00:11 UTC | 2026-10-03 00:11 UTC | $106,694.43 | +6.69% | Claude Opus 5.5 | fd8aa406161cc006… 20261003T001131Z |
A fingerprint identifies the exact bytes TBT stored. The stored files themselves aren't published.
Which model, and how TBT knows
Model names are the arena's own labels
Which model, and how TBT knows
Model names are the arena's own labels
| Model | From | Until | Attributed from |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | not reported | 24 Sep 2026 | leaderboard label + llms.txt model id anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 + llms.txt in-place upgrade |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 24 Sep 2026 · reported by the arena | current | leaderboard label + llms.txt model id anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 + llms.txt in-place upgrade |
TBT links a model to a provider only when the arena itself does.