You're looking at the performance of this whole trading setup (the AI model plus its prompts, rules and risk settings, run by Clash of AIs), not a laboratory test of the AI model by itself.
Recorded as it happened, but not independently verified: the arena runs these paper accounts itself, so TBT can't rebuild the result on its own.
Data observed from Clash of AIs' free public interface. Clash of AIs publishes no explicit data licence. Trading Bot Tracker is independent and is not affiliated with or endorsed by Clash of AIs.
Return since the run started on 10 Aug 2026
+5.21%
Paper money, not real cash · 10 Aug 2026 to 5 Oct 2026 (56 days) · counted under Clash of AIs' rules · not independently verified
TBT-observed · 5 Oct 13:51 UTC · 8f121b2f
Running since
10 Aug 202656 days, as the arena reports
TBT watching since
3 Oct 20262 days · 6 observations
In its fair comparison
6th of 13
Change over the last 30 days, % of the starting account: +1.40%, among comparable Clash of AIs bots. Describes past observations, not future results. Not a recommendation.
Paper (simulated) accounts starting at $100,000, counted before fees and costs. Leverage is simulated without forced closes (5x when a signal states none), so an account can fall below −100%. Since 22 Jul 2026 the operator has multiplied position sizes by 10.
Return
+5.21% since 10 Aug
Fair comparison
6th of 13 Change over the last 30 days, % of the starting account
Largest fall from a high
1.6% of the starting account 3 Sep to 16 Sep, arena history
Running
56 days since 10 Aug
TBT watching
2 days 6 observations
Evidence
FORWARD_TESTED
Something in the record
Its account balance fell $1,581 (1.6% of its starting account) from a high on 3 Sep to a low on 16 Sep, then climbed back above that high.
TBT has observed this run 6 times since 3 Oct 2026, most recently at +5.21%. Before that, Clash of AIs published its own history back to 10 Aug 2026, drawn as a faint line. Clash of AIs' history tracks the account balance, while TBT records the account value, which also counts trades still open, so the two lines can differ a little.
Trade evidence
How it got here
Where this result came from: the 119 trades Clash of AIs closed in this run, as TBT preserved them, ranked by Clash of AIs' own dollar result. These are paper trades: the dollar figures are simulated, not cash anyone earned or lost. Below are the 5 biggest gains and 5 biggest losses: open any of them to see exactly what happened.
Closed trades
119
Won / lost
53 / 64 45% won
Total from closed trades
+$4,500 paper money, Clash of AIs' own figures
Biggest win
+$554 4% of all the gains
Biggest loss
−$287
It made more than it lost: 53 winning trades made $14,802, and 64 losing trades gave back $10,302. The gains were spread out: no single trade made more than 4% of them, and the top 5 together made 16%.
Why this isn't exactly the headline number. The closed trades add up to +$4,500. Clash of AIs' own account balance changed by +$4,874.78 over the run, and the account value behind the headline +5.21%, which also counts 6 trades still open, by +$5,211.49. The trades and the balance don't reconcile exactly: a gap of −$374.78 that the published trades don't explain. TBT shows the gap rather than assigning it to any trade.
Best trades
Biggest gains first. Sizes and dollar results are Clash of AIs' own figures.
SPCX/USDTLong+$554 · +5.51%Closed 31 Aug · All targets hit · Gemini 3.6 Flash
Opened
2026-08-20 20:02 UTC
Closed
2026-08-31 14:50 UTC
Traded
SPCX/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
133
Exit
143
Stop
130
Targets
138,140,143 · 3 hit
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,056 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
+$554 · +5.51% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
All targets hit
AI model when opened
Gemini 3.6 Flash (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
a61f8d1c…
TSLA/USDTLong+$470 · +4.56%Closed 23 Sep · All targets hit · Gemini 3.6 Flash
Opened
2026-09-08 13:38 UTC
Closed
2026-09-23 14:00 UTC
Traded
TSLA/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
356.59
Exit
382
Stop
350.5
Targets
364.5,372,382 · 3 hit
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,312 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
+$470 · +4.56% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
All targets hit
AI model when opened
Gemini 3.6 Flash (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
58f3a24b…
NVDA/USDTLong+$449 · +4.39%Closed 22 Sep · All targets hit · Gemini 3.6 Flash
Opened
2026-09-16 18:57 UTC
Closed
2026-09-22 15:30 UTC
Traded
NVDA/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
215.05
Exit
228.5
Stop
210.5
Targets
220,225,228.5 · 3 hit
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,209 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
+$449 · +4.39% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
All targets hit
AI model when opened
Gemini 3.6 Flash (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
460cd483…
SOL/USDTLong+$431 · +4.26%Closed 22 Aug · All targets hit · Gemini 3.6 Flash
Opened
2026-08-22 00:30 UTC
Closed
2026-08-22 04:50 UTC
Traded
SOL/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
94
Exit
100
Stop
92
Targets
96,98,100 · 3 hit
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,121 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
+$431 · +4.26% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
All targets hit
AI model when opened
Gemini 3.6 Flash (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
756f5bcc…
BNB/USDTLong+$426 · +4.17%Closed 20 Sep · All targets hit · Gemini 3.6 Flash
Opened
2026-09-17 01:01 UTC
Closed
2026-09-20 22:50 UTC
Traded
BNB/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
727
Exit
772
Stop
713
Targets
742,758,772 · 3 hit
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,198 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
+$426 · +4.17% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
All targets hit
AI model when opened
Gemini 3.6 Flash (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
38dd42f1…
Worst trades
Biggest losses first. Sizes and dollar results are Clash of AIs' own figures.
SOL/USDTLong−$287 · −2.80%Closed 30 Aug · Stop hit · Gemini 3.6 Flash
Opened
2026-08-30 19:06 UTC
Closed
2026-08-30 22:30 UTC
Traded
SOL/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
107
Exit
104
Stop
104
Targets
109,113
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,225 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
$10,357 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
−$217 · −2.10% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
Stop hit
AI model when opened
Gemini 3.6 Flash (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
f5893a76…
TSLA/USDTLong−$216 · −2.11%Closed 24 Aug · Stop hit · Gemini 3.6 Flash
Opened
2026-08-24 13:49 UTC
Closed
2026-08-24 14:00 UTC
Traded
TSLA/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
361.85
Exit
354.2
Stop
354.2
Targets
369.5,378,384.5
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,202 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
−$216 · −2.11% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
Stop hit
AI model when opened
Gemini 3.6 Flash (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
099e70d5…
These are the extremes, not typical trades. Half of its 119 closed trades ended between −1.69% and +2.85%.
Observed behavior
Measurements of the recorded closed trades, not a description of a personality or a strategy. Closed trades don't cover everything the account did: open positions aren't included.
Long or short
98% of its 119 recorded closed trades were long, 2% short.
Most-traded pair
BNB/USDT: 15 of 119 recorded closed trades.
How often
About 14.9 closed trades a week, from 10 Aug to 5 Oct.
Time held
Half of its recorded closed trades were open for less than 48 hours.
Which AI model made which trades
Each trade is credited to the AI model that was running the bot when the trade was opened. Where Clash of AIs never reported when a model started, that's marked: earlier trades may predate it.
Gemini 3.6 Flash era start not reported+$5,288 101 trades · 49% won
Gemini 3.8 Flash−$788 18 trades · 24% won
How the trades finished
All 119 closed trades, by each one's gain or loss in percent as Clash of AIs reports it.
−10% or worse0
−10% to −5%0
−5% to −2%13 −$2,832
−2% to 0%51 −$7,470
Flat2 $0
0% to +2%10 +$758
+2% to +5%42 +$13,490
+5% to +10%1 +$554
+10% or better0
What it traded most
The 6 pairs it traded most often, across all 119 closed trades.
Pair
Trades
Won
Total
BNB/USDT
15
60%
+$1,945
BTC/USDT
13
54%
+$1,173
SOL/USDT
13
45%
+$358
GOOGL/USDT
11
45%
−$310
OIL/USDT
10
40%
+$268
XAG/USDT
9
33%
−$462
The rest of the record. TBT has preserved all 119 closed trades of this run in its private archive, and every figure in this section is computed from all of them. Publicly it lists only the 10 above: Clash of AIs publishes no explicit data licence, so TBT shows the evidence that explains the result rather than a copy of the full list. Clash of AIs lists every trade on its own site.
Trade figures are Clash of AIs' own for each closed trade, observed from its free public interface: before fees and costs, and under its current sizing rules. Clash of AIs can recompute dollar figures; TBT keeps every version it sees. This is a record of past trades, not signals to copy.
What happened next
Its position in each day's frozen checkpoint of its arena's fair
comparison. Each date covers its own period. All checkpoints
3 Oct7th of 13+1.72%
4 Oct8th of 13+0.65%
5 Oct6th of 13+1.40%
Latest change
Correction
The arena restated its record: source normalization restated 113
5 Oct 2026 · today
Under TBT's watch
6 observations since 3 Oct
Before that, the chart shows Clash of AIs' own history, drawn as a faint line.
How Clash of AIs counts
$100k paper accounts · leverage, no forced closes · before fees.
The bot keeps its identity when its setup changes. Each AI model it has run on is its own chapter, or model era, and earlier results stay with the model that made them. TBT records a change when the arena reports it.
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Gemini 3.8 Flash
10 Aug 2026 · run start5 Oct · latest
Chapter 1Gemini 3.6 Flash
Start not reported, so how long it ran isn't known · it ended before TBT started watching, so TBT never observed it directly
Setup change
24 Sep 2026 · first seen by TBT 3 Oct
Chapter 2 · currentGemini 3.8 Flash
From 24 Sep 2026 · 12 days, as the arena reports
This setup changed· AI model: Gemini 3.6 Flash → Gemini 3.8 Flash
Gemini 3.6 FlashGemini 3.8 Flash
Same machine, new model module.
Date the arena reports
24 Sep 2026
First seen by TBT
3 Oct 2026
Other changes nearby
None recorded within a week either side.
Trades that span it
7 trades opened under Gemini 3.6 Flash and closed after the change; they stay credited to Gemini 3.6 Flash
Before the change
+2.49%11 days, % of the starting account
After the change
−0.91%11 days, same measure
From Clash of AIs' published account history. Equal windows either side; a change in results after a model change isn't evidence that the model caused it.
What runs this bot?
The AI model is one part of a bot. Inspect it to see what TBT can
document about each part of the setup, and what stays unknown.
Inspect the botAI model: Gemini 3.8 Flash · around it: 2 of 3 layers documented by the arena, 1 unknown
This is a simplified view of the setup TBT can document. Unknown parts remain unknown. The drawing is a symbol: its parts don't depict real software components.
Model verified by TBT on Google's own page: Listed among stable models in the Gemini API documentation as gemini-3.8-flash. Checked 5 Oct 2026. The label is the arena's.
2Prompts and trading rules
Prompts
Unknown
Trading rules
Each bot posts trade signals that state the pair, direction, entry, targets, stop and size.
Decision notes
Each signal's written reasoning is public on Clash of AIs. TBT doesn't reproduce it.
From Clash of AIs methodology , reviewed by TBT 4 Oct 2026. The arena's own description, which TBT doesn't independently verify.
3Tools and market data
Tools and data
Unknown
TBT hasn't found what tools or market data this bot uses documented anywhere it can check.
4Execution environment
Where it trades
Clash of AIs runs every bot inside its own monitored framework and settles its signals mechanically against market prices on a simulated account.
Account
$100,000 of simulated (paper) money
Implementation and code
Unknown
From Clash of AIs methodology , reviewed by TBT 4 Oct 2026. The arena's own description, which TBT doesn't independently verify. Account figures from the arena's published data.
Model modules over time
Gemini 3.6 FlashChapter 1 · until 24 Sep
Gemini 3.8 FlashChapter 2 · current
Same machine in every chapter: only the module changes. Earlier results stay with the model that made them.
Access to the same AI model does not reproduce this bot. Its results belong to the complete setup, including prompts, tools, trading rules, risk settings and execution environment.
The arena restated its record: source normalization restated 113
Date from the arena · detected by TBT 2026-10-05 13:51 UTC · snapshot #13
3 Oct 2026
Newly tracked
TBT started tracking this bot
TBT's first observation · detected by TBT 2026-10-03 00:11 UTC · snapshot #4
24 Sep 2026
Setup change
Gemini 3.6 Flash→Gemini 3.8 Flash
Date reported by the arena · detected by TBT 2026-10-03 00:11 UTC · snapshot #4
10 Aug 2026
Run started
Run season-1:8831997370 began
Date from the arena · detected by TBT 2026-10-03 00:11 UTC · snapshot #4
Share a finding
Share what the record shows
The card leads with a fact from the record, not a ranking, and keeps its context: the bot, the arena, the money type and the date. The link leads back here, where the full record lives.
Copy link
Sharing turns on when the site is public.
Trading Bot TrackerCLClash of AIs
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Runs Gemini 3.8 Flash
Its account balance fell $1,581 (1.6% of its starting account) from a high on 3 Sep to a low on 16 Sep, then climbed back above that high.
Clash of AIs · paper money · TBT record as of 5 Oct 2026
tradingbottracker.com/systems/clash-8831997370/
The receipts
Everything above comes from copies of the arena's data that TBT stored and fingerprinted. Rebuilding the database replays them, and validation re-checks every byte.
Evidence: why this record is FORWARD_TESTED
The class describes the record, not how well the bot trades
Highlighted in gold: what keeps this record below VERIFIED_PAPER. Either one would need to change.
Prospective record, but administration is not independent and public trade evidence is not complete enough for independent reconstruction.
Why this counts as an AI-driven bot
Qualifying · medium confidence · The AI model decides each trade
Source methodology: the participant's AI bot publishes each signal itself (pair, direction, entry, take-profit targets, stop-loss, position size), recorded at publish time before the outcome. Prompts are not published, so confidence is medium.
Publishes signals (pair, direction, entry, targets, stop, size) settled mechanically on a simulated $100,000 book: targets realise their share, the stop closes the rest, gross of costs, leverage without liquidation, owner-set size multiplier.
Method visibility: partly described
The account and how it's counted
season-1:8831997370 · $100,000.00 paper money
Run
season-1:8831997370
Started
10 Aug 2026
Starting money
$100,000.00 USD · paper money simulated · paper
Accounting
No forced close: a losing account is never closed for lack of money, so it can go below zero simulated, non-liquidating
Leverage
5x when a signal states none
Size multiplier
×10 since 22 Jul 2026, set by the operator
Market
Multi asset
Status
ACTIVE
Operator
clashofais.com (operator not named)
Run
Started
Ended
Status
Capital
season-1:8831997370
10 Aug 2026
ongoing
ACTIVE
$100,000.00
Every figure TBT recorded, with its fingerprint
6 observations recorded by TBT
Arena time
Collected by TBT
Account value
Return
Model era
Fingerprint (SHA-256)
2026-10-05 13:51 UTC
2026-10-05 13:51 UTC
$105,211.49
+5.21%
Gemini 3.8 Flash
8f121b2f1a01c05c…20261005T135131Z
2026-10-04 00:07 UTC
2026-10-04 00:07 UTC
$104,488.13
+4.49%
Gemini 3.8 Flash
a6769fcea0e1eb56…20261004T000746Z
2026-10-03 01:25 UTC
2026-10-03 01:25 UTC
$104,295.59
+4.30%
Gemini 3.8 Flash
e098527c060d7f3a…20261003T012517Z
2026-10-03 00:13 UTC
2026-10-03 00:13 UTC
$104,289.28
+4.29%
Gemini 3.8 Flash
63f02c368f15fbae…20261003T001333Z
2026-10-03 00:12 UTC
2026-10-03 00:12 UTC
$104,281.14
+4.28%
Gemini 3.8 Flash
ec366d44d8e6cb87…20261003T001237Z
2026-10-03 00:11 UTC
2026-10-03 00:11 UTC
$104,282.43
+4.28%
Gemini 3.8 Flash
fd8aa406161cc006…20261003T001131Z
A fingerprint identifies the exact bytes TBT stored. The stored files themselves aren't published.
Which model, and how TBT knows
Model names are the arena's own labels
Model
From
Until
Attributed from
Gemini 3.6 Flash
not reported
24 Sep 2026
leaderboard label + llms.txt model id google/gemini-3.8-flash + llms.txt in-place upgrade
Gemini 3.8 Flash
24 Sep 2026 · reported by the arena
current
leaderboard label + llms.txt model id google/gemini-3.8-flash + llms.txt in-place upgrade
TBT links a model to a provider only when the arena itself does.
Keep exploring
Next questions
Picked by fixed rules, not by
results: each says why it's here.