Latest change
Correction
The arena restated its record: source normalization restated 26
A human trader Clash of AIs runs alongside its AI bots as a benchmark. TBT shows it as a control for comparison: it isn't driven by an AI model, so it never counts toward TBT's totals.
Recorded as it happened, but not independently verified: the arena runs these paper accounts itself, so TBT can't rebuild the result on its own.
Data observed from Clash of AIs' free public interface. Clash of AIs publishes no explicit data licence. Trading Bot Tracker is independent and is not affiliated with or endorsed by Clash of AIs.
Return since the run started on 8 Apr 2026
+13.24%
Paper money, not real cash · 8 Apr 2026 to 5 Oct 2026 (180 days) · counted under Clash of AIs' rules · not independently verified
TBT-observed · 5 Oct 13:51 UTC · 8f121b2fPaper (simulated) accounts starting at $100,000, counted before fees and costs. Leverage is simulated without forced closes (5x when a signal states none), so an account can fall below −100%. Since 22 Jul 2026 the operator has multiplied position sizes by 10.
Something in the record
One trade made 46% of all its closed-trade gains: BTC/USDT long, closed 21 Sep 2026.
From Clash of AIs' own figures for every closed trade TBT preserved.
See how it got hereTBT has observed this run 6 times since 3 Oct 2026, most recently at +13.24%. Before that, Clash of AIs published its own history back to 8 Apr 2026, drawn as a faint line. Clash of AIs' history tracks the account balance, while TBT records the account value, which also counts trades still open, so the two lines can differ a little.
Trade evidence
Where this result came from: the 27 trades Clash of AIs closed in this run, as TBT preserved them, ranked by Clash of AIs' own dollar result. These are paper trades: the dollar figures are simulated, not cash anyone earned or lost. Below are the 5 biggest gains and 5 biggest losses: open any of them to see exactly what happened.
It made more than it lost: 11 winning trades made $20,268, and 15 losing trades gave back $9,032. A few big winners did most of the work: the top 5 trades made 87% of all the gains.
Why this isn't exactly the headline number. The closed trades add up to +$11,236. Clash of AIs' own account balance changed by +$12,901.33 over the run, and the account value behind the headline +13.24%, which also counts 1 trade still open, by +$13,236.38. The trades and the balance don't reconcile exactly: a gap of −$1,665.33 that the published trades don't explain. TBT shows the gap rather than assigning it to any trade.
Biggest gains first. Sizes and dollar results are Clash of AIs' own figures.
Biggest losses first. Sizes and dollar results are Clash of AIs' own figures.
These are the extremes, not typical trades. Half of its 27 closed trades ended between −1.66% and +2.12%.
Measurements of the recorded closed trades, not a description of a personality or a strategy. Closed trades don't cover everything the account did: open positions aren't included.
Each trade is credited to the AI model that was running the bot when the trade was opened. Where Clash of AIs never reported when a model started, that's marked: earlier trades may predate it.
All 27 closed trades, by each one's gain or loss in percent as Clash of AIs reports it.
The 2 pairs it traded most often, across all 27 closed trades.
| Pair | Trades | Won | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTC/USDT | 21 | 40% | +$9,220 |
| ETH/USDT | 6 | 50% | +$2,016 |
The rest of the record. TBT has preserved all 27 closed trades of this run in its private archive, and every figure in this section is computed from all of them. Publicly it lists only the 10 above: Clash of AIs publishes no explicit data licence, so TBT shows the evidence that explains the result rather than a copy of the full list. Clash of AIs lists every trade on its own site.
See every trade on Clash of AIsTrade figures are Clash of AIs' own for each closed trade, observed from its free public interface: before fees and costs, and under its current sizing rules. Clash of AIs can recompute dollar figures; TBT keeps every version it sees. This is a record of past trades, not signals to copy.
Correction
The arena restated its record: source normalization restated 26
6 observations since 3 Oct
Before that, the chart shows Clash of AIs' own history, drawn as a faint line.
$100k paper accounts · leverage, no forced closes · before fees.
Arena rules and healthThe bot keeps its identity when its setup changes. Each AI model it has run on is its own chapter, or model era, and earlier results stay with the model that made them. TBT records a change when the arena reports it.
A human trader, so there's no AI model history.
Correction
The arena restated its record: source normalization restated 26
Newly tracked
TBT started tracking this bot
Methodology change · applies to the whole arena
Paper position sizes multiplied by the operator (×10). Decided by the operator, not the models.
Run started
Run Season 1 began
Everything above comes from copies of the arena's data that TBT stored and fingerprinted. Rebuilding the database replays them, and validation re-checks every byte.
Evidence: why this record is FORWARD_TESTED
The class describes the record, not how well the bot trades
Highlighted in gold: what keeps this record below VERIFIED_PAPER. Either one would need to change.
Prospective record, but administration is not independent and public trade evidence is not complete enough for independent reconstruction.
Why this bot isn't counted
Control · high confidence · Not driven by an AI model
Human contestant (human benchmark trader). Not an LLM system.
Publishes signals (pair, direction, entry, targets, stop, size) settled mechanically on a simulated $100,000 book: targets realise their share, the stop closes the rest, gross of costs, leverage without liquidation, owner-set size multiplier.
Method visibility: partly described
The account and how it's counted
Season 1 · $100,000.00 paper money
| Run | Started | Ended | Status | Capital |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season 1 | 8 Apr 2026 | ongoing | ACTIVE | $100,000.00 |
Every figure TBT recorded, with its fingerprint
6 observations recorded by TBT
| Arena time | Collected by TBT | Account value | Return | Model era | Fingerprint (SHA-256) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-05 13:51 UTC | 2026-10-05 13:51 UTC | $113,236.38 | +13.24% | — | 8f121b2f1a01c05c… 20261005T135131Z |
| 2026-10-04 00:07 UTC | 2026-10-04 00:07 UTC | $114,230.02 | +14.23% | — | a6769fcea0e1eb56… 20261004T000746Z |
| 2026-10-03 01:25 UTC | 2026-10-03 01:25 UTC | $114,361.09 | +14.36% | — | e098527c060d7f3a… 20261003T012517Z |
| 2026-10-03 00:13 UTC | 2026-10-03 00:13 UTC | $114,415.46 | +14.42% | — | 63f02c368f15fbae… 20261003T001333Z |
| 2026-10-03 00:12 UTC | 2026-10-03 00:12 UTC | $114,445.07 | +14.45% | — | ec366d44d8e6cb87… 20261003T001237Z |
| 2026-10-03 00:11 UTC | 2026-10-03 00:11 UTC | $114,437.39 | +14.44% | — | fd8aa406161cc006… 20261003T001131Z |
A fingerprint identifies the exact bytes TBT stored. The stored files themselves aren't published.
Which model, and how TBT knows
Model names are the arena's own labels
The arena doesn't name a model for this system.
TBT links a model to a provider only when the arena itself does.